logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.11 2016고단4673
업무상과실치상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 2016, the Defendant is a person engaged in cooking in the course of operating a sufficient restaurant under the trade name of “E” in the first floor C and D underground of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, Yeongdeungpo-gu.

On April 26, 2016, the Defendant, at around 16:43, 2016, placed the panty containing edible milk on the gas park, and dried by gas.

In that place, there is a ventilation duct above the kitchen, and the inner part of this glass connection is installed with the glass Slovaba, and with inedible oil, it could be moved to the glass connection pipe, which is the inner part of the duct for the refund flag installed above the kitchen, with fire added. In such a case, the person engaged in the cooking work of food was under the duty of care to prevent fire in advance by closely keeping the situation of cooking and preventing the inedible oil from being put to food and preventing it from being put to other places even if it is put to food, and by safely cooking work such as preventing fire from being put to the other places even if it is put to food.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not observe it properly, and did not properly control the intensity of gas gas gas emissions, thereby putting the above drum into food oil that had been heated by the above drums, and caused the fire to be transferred to the above drum connected with the above drum, thereby making the fire spread to other stores of the above building through the grasculing process. Accordingly, the Defendant caused the gas from gradified gas to spread to the underground parking lot of the above building.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the victim F (F) of the said fire-fighting gas that was caused by a fire in the above-mentioned underground parking lot of the building, the injury of the addiction of the oxygen that could not be known as the number of days of treatment, and at the same time, a person, such as the list of physical damage.

arrow