beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 104,138,254 with respect to the Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from June 6, 2015 to October 5, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant B is a representative who operates a D Hospital (hereinafter “D Hospital”) with employment of Defendant C, who is a major doctor of the New York.
B. On June 4, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at D Hospital on May 19, 2015, and was diagnosed with pressure 7 times in plehion. On June 5, 2015, the Plaintiff was conducted vertebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral ebral
C. On June 6, 2015, the Plaintiff complained of her donation and hertoma on the day of receiving the instant treatment, complained of the operation department and her to the bones, other than the hertoma and hertoma, and complained of the symptoms from both sides on June 7, 2015, and transferred to the Jeonbuk University Hospital on June 8, 2015.
On June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with spinal pressure on 7 occasions at the Jeonbuk University Hospital (hereinafter “the instant disability”) on the chronological pressure, and was submitted to the chronological 6-7 occasions on June 9, 2015, and was currently suffering from the chronological pressure, etc. (hereinafter “instant disability”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-3, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, and Gap evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff suffered disability, such as unfluenite febage, etc. due to pressure by Defendant C’s violation of the duty of care as follows. As such, Defendant C was a doctor to perform the instant surgery, and Defendant C was jointly liable for compensation for the Plaintiff’s damage pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act as an employer who employs Defendant C, and Defendant C was jointly liable for compensation pursuant to Article 756 of the Civil Act. A) Defendant C breached the duty of care in the process of Defendant C’s surgery as a medical specialist of nega, while performing the instant procedure outside the bones.