logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.16 2017고단4265
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 17, 2016, the number and medication of Mebacopon (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) was transferred 300,000 won to a new bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant at around 23:53 on May 16, 2016, using a new bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant at around 16:30 on May 17, 2016, and then received approximately 1g of the philopon, a local mental medicine, from I, on the road adjacent to the Mebacopon taxi platform in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.

Since May 17, 2016, the Defendant drawed about 0.3g of the penphones purchased at the Defendant’s house located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J 402 on May 17, 2016, and dyped by attaching a dyp with the dyp.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he purchased and sold philophones and administered them.

2. On June 2016, the Defendant, who administered a scopon, scopon, sent approximately 0.3g of the scopon, purchased at L's house located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu Incheon around 10:00, on June 6, 2016, on the scopon on the scopon, and dice by attaching the scopon to the scopon.

Accordingly, even though the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered philophones.

3. On June 2016, the Defendant, who administered a scopon, scopon, was dnicking a approximately 0.4g of the copon, purchased from the mutual influoral telephone in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as described in paragraph 1, on the scopon, and dnicking with the scopter by attaching it on the scopon.

Accordingly, even though the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered philophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the police statement (two times) made to E;

1. A statement on narcotics appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on remittance details;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., for the sake of facts constituting an offense, and Articles 60 (1) 3, and 4 (1) 3 (b) of the same Act, applicable to the choice of

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow