Text
1. On March 21, 2014, the Defendant issued an order to return the unemployment benefits amounting to KRW 950,550,020, which was issued to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for eligibility for unemployment benefits with the Defendant and received the total amount of KRW 2,710,850 for the following four occasions. The Plaintiff reported to the Defendant that he/she worked for 11 days during the period subject to the verification of unemployment by No. 3 of January 10, 2014, and 4 days during the period subject to the verification of unemployment by No. 4 of February 7, 2014.
The amount of payment for the days for recognition of the period subject to the recognition of unemployment recognition (won) on November 22, 2013, 2013 to November 8, 2013, or on November 22, 2013, 528,090 on December 13, 2013 to December 23, 2013, or December 13, 2013 to December 23, 2013; 3203, 3203, January 14, 2013 to October 14, 2014; 598, 500 on April 11, 2014; 201 to April 24, 2014;
B. The Defendant on January 24, 2014 and
2. 21. The Plaintiff was reported as having worked for 14 days during the period subject to the recognition of unemployment No. 3 and 6 days during the period subject to the recognition of unemployment No. 4, with respect to the electrical construction (supply and supply) among the new construction of a business incubator and the remodeling of a tugboat.
C. Since then, the Defendant made a voluntary report to the representative of B on March 10, 2014, stating that “Around December 23, 2013 to January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff reported that a total of 15 days of work should not be reported on a public holiday even though the Plaintiff had worked for 20 days in total at B from December 23, 2013 to January 16, 2014.”
Accordingly, on March 21, 2014, pursuant to Articles 61 and 62 of the Employment Insurance Act and Article 104 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff an order to return the unemployment benefits amounting to KRW 950,550 (i.e., the number of illegal receipt of the unemployment benefits for the pertinent period of violation KRW 105,610 on three days, 105,610) and a disposition to restrict payment (i.e., the return order or a disposition to restrict payment), and (ii) “each of the instant dispositions” in common name.
AB made it.
E. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the request for review on March 31, 2014, but the employment insurance examiner decided to dismiss the request on May 26, 2014.