2015 Mada394 Defamation, Forgery of Private Document, Uttering of Private Document, Intimidation, Information and Communications Network

Act on Promotion, etc. of Utilization, Protection of Location Information, and

Violation of the Use Act

OOO (1944years)

Kim Jong-soo (prosecution) and a trial in the case of a family;

Attorneys Kim Jong-woo, Osung-jin

July 3, 2015

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized evidence No. 1 (one location trackingr for vehicles) shall be confiscated from the accused.

Criminal Facts

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant was aware of the Victim ○○○ (n, 52 years of age) (n, 52) who was an instructor and was in a relationship with the victim from the first sexual intercourse with the victim on November 2013.

On the other hand, the victim was in an internal relationship with Kim ○ (Seoul, 53 years old) residing in Daegu Metropolitan City, and around April 2015, the defendant and the above Kim ○ became aware of the fact that all of the defendant and the above Kim ○ were in an internal relationship with the victim, respectively.

1. Defamation;

가. 피고인은 2014 . 6. 12.경 제주시 이도동에 있는 상호미상 커피숍에서 피해자와 같은 오카리나 강사협회의 회원인 현□□, 강○○, 한○○ 등에게 피고인과 피해자 간 의 성관계 사진을 보여주며 'x에 미친년, 샛서방 김○○과 결탁하여 3,500만 원을 달라 고 협박하는 년'이라는 취지로 말하여 공연히 사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손 하였다.

나. 피고인은 2014. 7. 17. 11:00경 피해자가 운영하는 제주시 연수로에 있는 오카리 나 학원 출입문에 '꽃뱀 현○○의 말씀, 나는 대구에 사는 샛서방 드라큐라 김○○과 불륜이지만 3년 넘도록 대구, 제주, 부산에서 단둘이 밀회하면서 동영상도 서로 찍어가 며 또 보며 즐기는데 왜 폭로하여 두 가정을 파괴시키려 합니까?, 꽃뱀 현○○ 010-8663-****, 샛서방 김○○ 010-9779-****, 드라큐라처럼 생긴 경상도 촌놈 김이 ○이라는 꽃뱀 현○○(제주오카리나학원장) 의 샛서방이 또 다른 샛서방에게 꽃뱀 현이 ○을 붙여놓고 삼천오백만 원 내 놓으라고 하다가 이천사백만 원 달라고 공갈 협박하 다가 고소당한 꽃뱀 현○○과 샛서방 드랴큐라 김○○ !!!' 이라는 내용의 전단지를 붙 이는 등 그 때부터 2014. 8. 4.경까지 별지 범죄일람표 2. 기재와 같이 모두 29회에 걸 쳐 같은 내용의 전단지를 피해자가 운영하는 학원출입문, 피해자의 승용차 , 피해자가 방과 후 강사로 일하는 ○○초등학교 체육관 후문 등에 부착하는 등 공연히 사실을 적 시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.;

가. 피고인은 2014. 6. 22. 16:33경 제주시 천수로에 있는 피고인의 아파트에서 피해 자가 강사인 오카리나 강좌를 수강하는 김□□가 사용하는 SNS인 '카카오스토리' 에 ' 현 ○○은 한국 팬플룻 오카리나 강사협회에서 품행 문제로 제명당했습니다. 작은울림 회 원들, 현○○의 남자섭렵은 동네 똥개도 못 따라가요. 심지어 샛서방과 짜고 현○○이 성동영상을 직접 찍어 드라큐라처럼 생긴 새서방 김○○에게 둘이는 N드라이브가 설 치되어 있어 계속 실시간 중계되는 것이 N드라이브로 본 드라큐라 김○○이란 샛서방 이 또 다른 샛서방에게 2,400만 원을 내 놓으라고 공갈치다 지금 목에 큰 가시가 걸렸 답니다'이라는 내용의 글을 게시한 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄일람표 1. 기재와 같이 그 때부터 2014. 6. 25. 20:16경까지 같은 방법으로 같은 취지의 글을 게시하는 방법으로 불특정 다수가 볼 수 있는 위 김□□의 SNS에 피해자를 비방할 목적으로 공공연하게 사실을 드러내어 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

B. At around 20:31 on July 10, 2014, the Defendant sent the victim’s Handphone (010-3569-**) using Handphones (010-3569-**) used by the victim’s Handphone (63 years of age) residing in Seoul at the above Defendant’s residence, and sent the husband with knife, but knife unfolded with knife, while her husband was suspected of knife at knife, the Defendant sent the victim’s knife’s knife with knife, “I do not like South,” and sent the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

3. Violation of the Act on Intimidation, Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.

피고인은 위 피고인의 주거지에서 피해자가 사용하는 핸드폰(010-5755-****)으로 2014. 7. 7. 14:42경 '내가 말한대로 약속을 지켰으면 너가 필요할 때 너가 하고 싶을 때 언제나 가질 수 있는 보지를 네놈 스스로 차버린거야, 알겠냐? 내놈이 잔대가리 굴 리지 말고 내말을 충실히 따랐다면 네놈 죽는 날까지 그 보지를 빨아주고 박아 넣을 수 있었는데'라는 내용으로, 2014. 7. 9. 00:48경 '내일 드라큐라 김○○과의 샛서방 관 계를 서울 언니에게 먼저 알리고 그 다음 차례는 누구야? 너의 답변 없으면 큰 딸 차 례이니'라는 내용으로 각각 문자메시지를 보낸 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄일람표 5. 기재 와 같이 모두 59회에 걸쳐 피해자의 성관계 사실을 가족 및 지인들에게 알리겠다는 취 지의 문자메시지를 보내어 피해자를 협박함과 동시에 정보통신망을 통하여 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 문언 또는 영상을 반복적으로 피해자에게 도달하게 하였다.

4. Violation of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Location Information;

The Defendant purchased a location tracking device for a vehicle for the purpose of monitoring the victim's husband in order to check the scene where the victim met Kim○, and to inform the victim's husband, purchased the location tracking device for the purpose of monitoring the victim's location. On June 2014, the Defendant collected the location information of the vehicle, which is the object of movement of the victim, without the consent of the victim, by attaching a location tracking device to the back of the driver's seat of the rocketing car in front of the victim's parking place.

5. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

On June 17, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, made a document under the name of the head of the Madao Association or the Jeju-do branch office located in the Jeju-do branch office where the Defendant is an adviser and sent it to the Defendant, without authority, for the purpose of uttering at the office A located in the Jeju-do branch office where the Defendant is an adviser, and the present situation belonging to the ○○○ who works for the Madari branch office of the Association, submitted the letter of resignation and the withdrawal from membership, but returned it to the Switzerland, and removed it as a whole. It is for reference to the business. The Defendant: (a) made the document under the name of the Madao branch office located in the Jeju-do branch office where the Defendant was an adviser; and (b) made the document to the Mada branch office of the Association; and (c) made the document to forgee and use the document related to the Mada branch office of the Republic of Korea; and (d) made the document to use it.

Summary of Evidence

Omission

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.; Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 74(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.; Articles 44(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.; Articles 40 subparag. 4 and 15(1) of the Act on Protection, Use, etc. of Location Viewing, Article 231 of the Criminal Act; Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act; Article 231 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial competition;

Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act / [Trade the Act on Promotion, etc. of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. due to repeated arrival of the text causing intimidation

1. Selection of punishment;

Each Imprisonment Selection

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act

Reasons for sentencing

In light of the contents of the facts alleged by the Defendant, the degree of expression, the means of statement of fact, the other party, the number of crimes, the period of crime, etc., the nature of the crime is not very good, and the Defendant continues to send letters and e-mail to the victim even after receiving the complaint from the victim, and even after receiving the complaint from the victim, it appears that the victim was suffering from considerable mental pain due to the instant case, and the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victim, it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant with sentence on the Defendant.

The defendant is recognized as a substitute for a crime, there is no record of punishment or criminal punishment heavier than a fine, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and the circumstances of the crime shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the defendant's age, character and behavior,

Freeboard Kim