Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding or adding as mentioned below 2, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. A part concerning addition or height;
(a) Grade 2 through 10 of the judgment of the first instance; and
A. The E funeral hall is located on the ground of the land B at Jeju-si, and the parking lot attached to the above funeral hall is located on the ground of the land C and D, and among which the land at Jeju-si is adjacent to the F ditch at Jeju-si, and the land at Jeju-si is adjacent to the F ditch at Jeju-si. The land at the above Jeju-si and F ditch is owned by the defendant.
The ditches are installed with a 1.5m or 2m of the depth with concrete (hereinafter “instant waterway”). At the place where the instant waterway and the instant parking lot site adjoin, there is a slope of falling down with concrete with the height of the vehicle’s wheels at the place where the instant waterway and the instant parking lot site adjoin.
B. On the 2nd 12th 13th 13th 2th 2th 2nd 13th 2nd 2nd 2nd 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd
“A parking on the passage route” was parked by adding even the part of the driver’s seat of the vehicle in this case to the fall prevention threshold so that it does not interfere with the passage of other vehicles.
C. The “each evidence” in the 3th 7th 7th tier of the first instance court ruling was added to “each evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence Nos. 5 through 7, evidence No. 8-1 through 3, and evidence No. 9.” In the front of “the 12th st st st 12th st st st st 2,” “the Defendant permitted the development of the attached parking lot to be installed on the land of the Jeju-si, Inc., which operates the funeral hall on April 16, 2015.” The above company, other than the above land, was illegally packaged in the land of the Jeju-si, which was created as a passage of the attached parking lot, was prohibited from entering the above attached parking lot without going through the above D land, and the Defendant’s affiliation.