1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 13, 2014 to April 24, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff has one woman under the Matri-Mano-Man legal father in March 10, 2001 with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

B. The Defendant became aware of C while working as a part-time holder within a large retailer C’s working at a large retailer for a week, and the Defendant became aware of C’s contact after only keeping the part-time part-time part-time part-time part-time part.

C. C promised to receive a gift gift from the immediately preceding Defendant in 2013 that the Plaintiff would not have any intention to ask the relationship with the Defendant, and would not receive the case value from the Defendant.

C) A company goes out to the easy day, and C tried to look back with a thickness time and have a sexual relationship by the 12th day of the night.

E. On October 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) recognized that the Plaintiff was inappropriate relations from January 2, 2014 to September 2014; (b) the Defendant, in the future, did not contact but did not leave two times in the future; and (c) prepared a letter stating that “In the event of such route, all the other parties will accept evidentiary materials, disclosure of the judgment, and any disadvantage” and issued it to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 11, and purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A person who has a spouse for liability for damages or a person who has committed an unlawful act shall constitute a tort against his/her spouse, and shall have the obligation to inflict a mental suffering inflicted upon his/her spouse;

In addition, fraudulent acts stipulated in Article 840 subparagraph 1 of the Civil Code include all acts which are considered not to be faithful to the duty of mutual assistance of the married couple, even though they did not reach the common sense as well as the common sense.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant's act of maintaining C and inappropriate conditions while being aware of the fact that the non-party C is the father-child of his spouse.