logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.03.09 2017구단50419
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 10, 2005, the Plaintiff, a foreigner with the nationality of Pakistan, entered and staying in the Republic of Korea as a status of technical training (D-3) on August 10, 2005, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on December 30, 2015.

B. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 21, 2016, but was dismissed on October 27, 2016, and the Plaintiff received a notice of dismissal decision on December 27, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was a hydropathm forest, which was a police officer, and rejected the Plaintiff’s request after being requested to open the species from the Simslopic 7-8 Simopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic slopic

Therefore, even though the Plaintiff’s disposition constituted a refugee suffering from persecution on the ground of social status, which is a member of a religion or a specific group, is unlawful.

B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 subparag. 2-2 and Article 76-2(1) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 1 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”), and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, the Minister of Justice is persecutioning on grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group or political opinion.

arrow