All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a two-year imprisonment and a five-year suspended sentence) that the lower court sentenced the Defendants are too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendants, when the Defendants were under drinking together with the Defendant’s daily behaviors at the drinking house, was committed with the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim who was in a state of mental or physical disability or inability to resist, under the mutual invitation of the sobrier, and was committed by the victim with the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim who was in a state of mental or physical disability or inability to resist. The crime of this case was committed against the Defendants, such that the crime was committed against the Defendants, such as where the victim was taken with the cell phone camera, and sent the victim to the Kakakao Kao Kao Kao Mec, and that the crime was very poor, and that

However, in light of all the circumstances that are favorable to the Defendants, including the fact that the Defendants were fully aware of the crime of this case and the Defendants did not want to punish the Defendants, and that there is no record of criminal punishment. Considering such circumstances and all other circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.