1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 85,649,488 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from December 22, 2014 to January 26, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 7, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) on June 6, 201, leased an office of 248 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) of part 5 stories of the building for use of medicinal water on the ground of 369-11, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant by June 6, 2013; (b) lease deposit is KRW 100 million; (c) monthly rent is KRW 6.5 million; and (d) monthly management fee is KRW 100,000 (excluding value-added tax); and (c) the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 100,000 as lease deposit.

B. The plaintiff and the defendant are above A.

On July 31, 2012, the term of the lease agreement was changed from July 31, 2012 to July 30, 2014 to 454.5 square meters (hereinafter “the instant building”); the monthly rent is KRW 12 million; monthly management expenses (excluding value-added tax); monthly management expenses are KRW 1,937,500 (excluding value-added tax); and the term of the lease agreement was changed from July 31, 2012 to July 30, 2014.

C. On November 14, 2012, in order to secure the Defendant’s obligation to refund the lease deposit amount of KRW 100 million, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage amounting to KRW 100 million with respect to the building and site on which the instant building was located, with respect to the maximum debt amount.

On June 19, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the purport that “I will terminate the lease contract as of July 30, 2014, the expiration date of the contract”.

E. The plaintiff is above D.

On June 26, 2014, it is confirmed that there is no intention to renew the lease contract according to the content certification dispatched by the Defendant on June 19, 2014. Thus, it is true that the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the content certification that he/she will perform his/her duty of lessee, such as the termination of the contract due to the expiration of the contract period and the surrender of the leased object, even before July 30, 2014, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the termination of the contract due to the expiration of the contract period and the surrender of the leased object by July 30, 2014.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff.