1. The appeal on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the counterclaim extended by this court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is to delete the following items of the judgment of the court of first instance, to add the dismissal or contents as follows, and to add the new argument in the court of first instance as to the new argument in the court of first instance as set forth in the following paragraph 2, and thus, it is the ground of the judgment of the court

See the first instance judgment’s 9th 7th h 7th h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

From 10 to 11th 7th 7th 7th 11th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 6th 9th 2th 6th 9th 7th 2th 3th 196), the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the grave was removed. The right to the protection and management of the grave, including the Defendant’s claim to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the graveyard, is exclusively attached to the family heir, so it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff, who is a clan, has acquired the right to the right to the right to the right of the graveyard of this case solely on the ground that he refused to defend, manage, and maintain the deceased’s graves while going to the church.

B. In any case of the relevant legal principles, since the institution is based on customs, customs is considered, and customs is newly formed according to social changes rather than past customs.