The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is engaged in agriculture by returning to the farm before four years prior to the facts charged, and the victim B is the husband and wife as the husband and wife.

On October 26, 2013, at around 15:50 on October 26, 2013, the Defendant used a knife-type knife (1.5 cm) from the back of the Defendant’s vehicle that had been staying outside and returned from October 16, 2013 to October 25, 2013, with the Defendant’s vehicle knife-type knife at the back seat of the Defendant’s vehicle knife, and with the Defendant’s vehicle knife at the time of “the Defendant’s death at the time of this year........................, the Defendant threatened the Defendant with the Defendant’s knife-type knife-type knife and knife-type knife knife knife knife knife.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, on November 22, 2013, after the institution of the instant indictment, the written withdrawal of the complaint that the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant was submitted. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.