Defendant

A Imprisonment of 1 year, Defendant B and C shall be sentenced to 10 months, Defendant D shall be sentenced to 6 months, and Defendant E shall be punished by a fine of 2.

Punishment of the crime

[Status of Defendants] Defendant A is a person who operates a L station in Pyeongtaek-gun, Nam-gun, Nam-gun, Defendant B is a person who operates N in Pyeongtaek-gun M, and Defendant C is an employee from P in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to work as an employee.

[Basic Facts] The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, as part of the measures to support livestock farmers, decided that 20% of the total facility construction cost should be provided first to livestock farmers who attempt to modernize livestock pens as part of the measures to support livestock farmers. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry decided that 30% of the total facility construction cost should be subsidized by the State at the expense of the State. The livestock raiser, who is less than 150 m2 and less than 1050m2 of the size of the livestock shed (a quasi-professional farmer, a quasi-professional farmer, and a professional farmer), with the State subsidy, shall provide loan interest along with the loan interest. The livestock shed, a livestock shed with not less than 150m2 and a livestock shed with not less than 10m2 in size (a company farmer), and a person who owns a livestock shed without permission or a person who has not registered agricultural enterprises shall be excluded from the subsidy, and a person who has not recovered the existing livestock shed.

After the Defendants established one large-scale livestock shed on the building site in Pyeongtaek-gun Q in the past, Defendant A was actually expected to operate the said livestock shed and to engage in the livestock industry, as if they were to establish three livestock pens in order to obtain subsidies, the Defendants were to apply for the modernization of the livestock shed facilities in their respective names and to establish three livestock pens with the payment of subsidies, and to connect the roof, etc. of the livestock shed to make it a single livestock shed. In addition, Defendant A had an unauthorized part of the livestock industry registration certificate in the name of R, and was not registered as an agricultural business entity, and entrusted the litigation to the farm, which is the symptoms of the registration of the livestock industry.