(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고정2105

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.10 2016고정2105

협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant became aware of the Victim C (45 years) who was detained as a drug offender in the Seoul detention center, and was committed by the victim upon the request of the relevant narcotics offender to cooperate with the victim to reduce the sentence, and was committed in other cases, the Defendant could no longer proceed with the work, and was misunderstandingd by the victim.

On February 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Seoul detention center located in the city of the Gyeonggi-do around 10:00, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Defendant for the crime of rape, and (b) the Defendant’s gue, such as the State waste, was recklessly and recklessly caused the gue, and the Defendant’s gue, as if the gue, would be against the gue.

“If any sacrifice was made within the country, the victim was threatened by taking advantage of the letter “Isma immediately so doing” and seeing it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statements;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The defendant asserts that the letter sent by the victim [the defendant] does not constitute a crime of intimidation or constitutes a justifiable act in light of all circumstances.

In such a crime of intimidation, the term "Intimidation" means a threat of harm that may generally be deemed to cause fear to an ordinary person, and in cases where a notice of harm and injury was given to the other party as part of the exercise of the right or execution of the duty, and as part of the exercise of the right or execution of the duty, if the notice of harm and injury does not go against social norms as a legitimate exercise of the right or execution of the duty, the crime of intimidation is not established. However, even if it appears to be a legitimate exercise of the right or execution of the duty, if it is practically abuse of the right or the execution of the duty and goes against social norms, it shall be deemed that the crime of intimidation is established. Specifically, if the notice of harm and injury can be deemed to be a considerable means for the legitimate purpose, the illegality

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2013.02.01 2012노2926

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.03.22 2017고정156

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.12.21 2018고정103

-창원지방법원 2017.11.02 2017노2091

-대법원 2007. 9. 28. 선고 2007도606 전원합의체 판결