logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.08.12 2015고단1356
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle with two highest directions in violation of the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the Road Traffic Act;

At around 14:20 on August 31, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car and proceeded with D's front road in Ansan-si, a member C from Ansan-si, with a loan-free side.

At the time, a vehicle stops on the front of the defendant's driving direction due to the stop of the vehicle, so in such a case, a person engaged in the vehicle driving duty has a duty of care to reduce the speed and thoroughly drive the vehicle at the front time, and to secure the safety distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and stopped in the front direction of the course of the E, while driving a Fbelost passenger car driven by the E, which was driven by the Defendant, and due to its shock, the said Bbelost passenger car was driven by the victim G who stopped in the front direction of the E, and the said Abelost passenger car was driven by the Defendant, and due to its shock, the said Abelost passenger car was driven by the J Hastst passenger car stopped in the front direction of the E.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim G and the victim K who was on board the said car, respectively, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed and damaged the said Aburg-purged car to be in an amount equivalent to KRW 3,181,000, and escaped without immediately stopping the car and taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a passenger car with B investment risk.

The Defendant operated B-hand automobiles without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), as stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G's written statement of accident;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site, etc. photographs;

arrow