1. The defendant

A. 4,800,000 won to Plaintiff A, 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff D, 10,000 won to Plaintiff G, 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff G, and 10.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, along with L, M, N,O, P, Q, R (one name “S”, “T”), is a person who used virtual currency under the name of “U” (or “V,” “W” (hereinafter “the instant coin company”).

B. R serves as the designer and the president of the instant co-owner, and the Defendant served as a planning representative who exercises overall control over the operation and management of the recruitment center education team, computer team, etc.

The Defendant and the instant coin employees are very safe for investors, including the Plaintiffs, to mine in the block chain method such as X cocoin. Since the current market price is low but its value is continuously increased in the future, there will be a lot of profits if they make an investment. It is soon to make an investment in the past. X coin has been 90 million in the past, so it does not seem to have absolute losses because the value is not absolutely lowered, and it does not always go up. Coins who hold at any time are able to make a cash refund. Goods can also be purchased from an exclusive shopping mall such as cash. It is also a machine or exclusive app development. After several months, it is said that after several months, it will guarantee high profits up to several hundreds of the principal amount.

The Defendant, etc. received investments from investors from around January 27, 2015 to November 27 of the same year.

Of them, the amount invested by the plaintiffs shall be as stated in the item column of the attached Table.

C. However, the above co-user was limited to his own shopping mall operated by the Defendant, etc., and the money exchange itself was restricted, and the Defendant did not own the real assets that can guarantee the value of the above co-owner.

The defendant et al.'s business methods receive investments from the plaintiffs and then receive other investors.