1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project name: C development project (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Notice, etc.: C Designation on February 5, 2009 (Development Plan) and Notice of Topographical Map (Public Notice S) on September 18, 2009; Notice of Amendment to C Development Plan and Approval of Implementation Plan (Public Notice D) on September 18, 2009; Notice of Approval of Amendment to C Development Plan and Implementation Plan on November 5, 2010 (Public Notice E): Defendant

B. The subject matter of expropriation by the Jeonnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”) on June 14, 2013: F forest land 1,653 square meters owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”)

(2) The starting date of expropriation: Compensation for losses: 117,197,700 won (=70,900 square meters x 1,653 square meters, and detailed details are attached Table 117,197,70 won (=70,900 square meters x 1,653 square meters)

1. The same as the entry in the appraisal report;

A person shall be appointed.

C. Compensation for losses by the Central Land Tribunal on November 20, 2014 (hereinafter “instant judgment”): Increase to KRW 119,511,900 (i.e., 72,300 square meters x 1,653 square meters)

D. As a result of the commission of appraisal by the court of first instance (hereinafter “court appraisal”): Compensation for losses: 251,256,600 won (i.e., 152,000 square meters x 1,653 square meters): An appraisal based on the premise that the instant land falls under a residential area;

E. On the other hand, the Plaintiff reserved an objection on July 15, 2013 after the instant ruling on expropriation, and was paid KRW 117,197,70 from the Defendant for compensation.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy Facts, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the court of first instance commissioning appraiser H with appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. Although the instant land is designated as a green area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, each of the instant land in the vicinity of the instant land (hereinafter “instant neighboring land”) is a specific use area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.