logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.12.07 2017고단1716
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced car.

1. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act driving the said car on around 17:48, and driving it on around 10 occasions in total, 10 occasions, such as: (a) the driving of the said car on the side of the vice-fluor in the direction of the river in the direction of the river in the city of the same time from the front of the apartment road to about 6km section in the same city of the new-fluor; (b) two times the central line bed, and eight times the violation of the prohibition of career change.

Accordingly, the defendant was driving a scarcity by threatening or endangering others or causing danger to traffic.

2. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), driving the said car around 18:03, and making the turn to the left on the apartment of the said Jeju-ro 2 complex, the front of the apartment road, which is located in the new and new road at the time of an influence of the said car.

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to safely proceed with the cross-section by checking the right and the right of the front and the right of the driver and to operate the car in compliance with the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and entered the road on the side of the apartment zone 2 in the above main line by cutting off the above crossing line and making a left turn widely in the U form, and entered the road on the side of the apartment zone beyond the center line, and then, the part of the victim E's car driver's car driver's seat even with the driver's seat of the victim stopped in front of the left side of the vehicle of the defendant E's car, and damaged the 335,751 won of the repair cost, such as the driver's seat plate of the victim's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures even after destroying and damaging the car of the injured party due to the above occupational negligence, and escaped as it is.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident scene;

1. Written estimate;

1. A report of investigation (in addition, driving in fluorite vehicle).

arrow