logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.10 2017나15750
부당이득반환등
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below.

Reasons

1. A part of the reasoning of the court of first instance excluding the conclusion among the reasons to be explained by the court concerning this case is identical to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following two provisions between the fourth and fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part added “C. Judgment on the Defendants’ Defense 1) The summary of the defense deposited KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff by Defendant B with the deposit of KRW 30,000,000, the said amount should be deducted from the Defendants’ damages amount.

2) According to the evidence Nos. 8-1, 2, and 17 evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 17-1, Defendant B deposited KRW 30,00,00 with the Plaintiff on May 31, 2017 after the judgment of the court of first instance, and the Plaintiff reserved and received the above deposit money. As to the amount of KRW 30,00,000 with the amount of damages equivalent to KRW 30,000,00,000 from March 11, 2016 to KRW 30,000,000 with the amount of KRW 15,510,000 with the amount of damages of KRW 30,50,000 with the amount of KRW 80,50,000 with the amount of damages of KRW 30,50,505,000 with the amount of damages of KRW 16,505,005,00,005,00.

arrow