logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.23 2018가합512872
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, C, and D jointly share KRW 330,752,166 and their related thereto from February 21, 2018 to May 23, 2019.

Reasons

Basic Facts

At around 02:42 on December 4, 2016, Defendant B driven the FOba (hereinafter “the instant two-wheeled vehicle”) on a two-lane road in front of the H Hospital located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane red control three-lanes from the 2nd intersection of the red control three-lanes, and entered the intersection (hereinafter “instant intersection”) in front of the H Hospital, without violating the stop signal at the intersection where the electric signal, etc. was installed.

Nonparty I shall, on the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) above, hold K-business taxi owned by J (hereinafter “instant taxi”).

In order to avoid the instant two-wheeled vehicle that entered the intersection in violation of the stop signal at a speed of 93 km in speed above the speed of 60 km per hour according to the course signal from the sular road to the sular road. At the same time, I changed the direction to the right side to avoid the instant two-wheeled vehicle that entered the intersection in violation of the stop signal at the intersection, but there was an accident in which the said columns were continuously collisioned with the said columns by failing to avoid facing the said pole and signal signal lights near the said intersection (hereinafter referred to as the “accident”).

3) On the back of the instant taxi due to the instant accident, passengers Nonparty L (hereinafter “the deceased”).

) The Plaintiff and the Defendants were sent to the Emergency Service Center of H Hospital due to the injury and died of two copies and long-term damage on the same day, and the other passengers M on board the back of the instant taxi suffered from approximately three weeks of treatment. The Plaintiff and the Defendants are mutual aid contractors who entered into a mutual aid agreement on the instant taxi. Defendant D as the owner of the instant son’s vehicle, and “O” (hereinafter “O”) from Defendant C and Seodaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant restaurant”).

The defendant C is a driver of the two-wheeled vehicle of this case.

arrow