1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows. Thus, the part which was used by the court of first instance is as it is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2) above. The part which was already used by the court of first instance: (a) prior to the third through 17th of the judgment of the court of first instance (the first instance 2.A.); (b) the plaintiff has already withdrawn from and delivered the above real estate on November 2013; and (c) there was no fact that the above real estate was actually used and used thereafter; (d) the defendant's claim for unjust enrichment equivalent to 3.2 million won in arrears or rent from a compulsory auction of this case is unfair; and therefore, (e) the compulsory execution against KRW 3.2 million in the amount of the claim for compulsory auction of this case should be rejected after the conclusion of the final judgment (Article 44 (2) of the Civil Execution Act); and (e) the plaintiff's allegation that the above part of the final judgment prior to the final judgment should be dismissed.