1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for this court's explanation is as follows, except for the cases where the part No. 3 and No. 8 of the first instance court's decision is reversed as follows. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(B) However, the part that was cut on 2. Cut-mar. 2.

B. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff asserts that the expenses for the restoration of the building caused by the instant accident are ① 4,617,342 won for the panel work, ② 1,837,024 won for painting work, ③ electrical construction ③ 5,046,920 won, ④ 320,235 won for the steel framed work ⑤ 4,18,022 won for the removal of the building, ② 3,897,490 won for the removal of the building, and 73,081,682 won for the removal of the building. 2) The property damage caused by the illegal act means the property disadvantage caused by the illegal harmful act, namely, the difference between the property situation that would have existed if the illegal act had not been committed, and the present property status of the illegal act should be calculated on the basis of the tort at the time of the illegal act.

In other words, the point at which the present standard is used is that it means the time of tort in the sense of meaning, and the present time does not mean the time of closing argument in the fact-finding court from the meaning of the present time

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Da91828 Decided April 29, 2010). In this case, each of the statements Nos. 3, 9, and 10 in evidence Nos. 3 and 10 in the instant case, and the fact-finding with respect to the representative director of Dasa Damage Evaluation Co., Ltd. at the court of the first instance, may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of pleadings as a result of the fact-finding conducted by the court of the first instance, the following circumstances, namely, the instant fire, namely, the wall board and tent of the instant building, and the power cable and ceiling installed on the wall and tent installed on the wall surface, the power cable and ceiling installed on the wall, the water pipe installed on the wall, the wall, and the ceiling board installed on the wall are destroyed, and the part of the three-dimensional facilities were partially damaged, and the building parts destroyed by the accident in the instant case are likely to be