Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter and B Poter, a stock company.

At around 14:50 on January 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle, and driven the four-lane road in front of the D, which is located in Ansan-si member C, Ansan-si, at the speed of about 40 to 50km from the side of the lake park to the viewing.

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely proceeding in accordance with the signals, since the traffic control is a blind-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by signal, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part of the part on the top side of the car driving seat of the F EXE car driven by the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 62 years old) who was driven by the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 62 years old) along the three-lane way on the side of the car driving seat from the 1st apartment of treatment apartment by the negligent negligence in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and H in part;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. The signal system map;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel entered the intersection by reporting that green etc. such as signals installed on the driving direction of the vehicle operated by the defendant turn on, and without passing through, the green etc. after leaving the intersection, the red light was immediately cut off without a yellow light, etc., and the damaged vehicle entered the intersection without speed or temporary stop, and the part of the back of the defendant's vehicle was shocked. Thus, prior to the red light, it had already entered the intersection in this case.