Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000 (three million).

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On February 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “E restaurant” restaurant for the victim D’s D operation in Macheon-si, Macheon-si on February 12, 2018; (b) under the influence of liquor F, who assaulted F, and was placed on the container of the victim, thereby impairing its utility.

B. The Defendant interfered with the duties of the Defendant, by force, interfered with the operation of the victim D’s restaurant by avoiding the disturbance, such as: (a) intending to take the chair at a large interest at the time and place specified in paragraph 1’s (a); (b) and (c) taking the chair into consideration; and

2. Police Officers of the G District of Defendant B’s Gyeonggi Police Station G District shall be male and female.

“On February 12, 2018,” upon receipt of 112 reports, sent to E around February 12, 2018 as “E.”

In the front of the above restaurant, the police officer arrested Defendant A as a current offender, such as assaulting, interference with duties, etc., and the Defendant: (a) assaulted Defendant H as “I ambb kack, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb, I amb amb, I ambling his chest by two descendants.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning on-site measures and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of F, D, I, J, K and H;

1. Photographs;

1. 112 Notification to the department related to the reported case; and

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the same Act, and Article 36(2) of the Selection of each fine: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order shows the attitude of the Defendants to mislead and reflect the misunderstanding of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The Defendants seem to have committed the instant crime by contingency.

In addition, the age, sex, environment, and age of the Defendants.