Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around October 30, 2013, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as taking the father of the victim D (years 32) who was passed with his/her family, taking the victim’s desire to take care of his/her father, without any justifiable reason, and taking advantage of the victim’s obsing him/her, taking the victim’s drinking, taking the victim’s drinking, and collecting wastes.
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer F (the age of 27) who belongs to the Sungnam Police Station E District Unit after receiving a report on the date and time and place mentioned in paragraph (1) of this Article, to see whether the act of assault as described in paragraph (1) was brought to the police officer F (the age of 27), and thus obstructing F’s performance of duties by assaulting the police officer’s 112 reporting movement work, by plucking, plucking up two hand descendants of the above police officer, walking up the door of nearby house, walking up the door of nearby house, walking up the door of nearby house, walking up the door of nearby house, and cutting up the door of plastic ploss of the above police officer, thereby obstructing F’s performance of duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each statute on police statements made to D and F;
1. Article 136 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act that applies to the relevant criminal facts and that of the choice of punishment: Selection of imprisonment;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;