The Defendants are not guilty. The Defendants publicly notify the summary of the acquittal against Defendant A.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B is the lessee of the “E” store located in Scheon-si D, who subleted the victim F (if known, sixty years old), and Defendant B is the seat of Defendant B.

Defendant

B terminated the lease relationship with the lessor of the said “E” store, and as the victim removed from the said store, the Defendant B and the victim suffered the loss on whom the ownership of the goods in the said store belongs.

On January 2, 2013, at around 17:49, the Defendants reported the victim’s leaving the said store to take away goods located in the said store from the said store and prevented them from taking them out on board the sprinking, and then, Defendant A was in favor of the victim’s head, and Defendant B took part in the head debt of the victim, and Defendant B took part in the head debt of the victim and took the face of the victim’s head at one time.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the scopical base that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the victim.

2. The evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes each of the statements in the victim F investigative agencies and in this court, the witness G and H investigative agencies and this court. However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, each of the above evidence is difficult to believe, or it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim.

F’s statement (1) The F stated that the police officer of the Macheon Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the report of the assault on the date of the occurrence of the instant case, was assaulted by Defendant B and his first f (Defendant A, J, and male son). He asked F whether the said I was assaulted by Defendant B’s first f, and F was sealed by Defendant A’s head f.