A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2016, from around 20:30 to around 21:30, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business by drinking alcohol at the victim D’s main station operated by Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon’s 1st century. The Defendant: (a) was unable to resist the victim’s drinking at the victim’s 1st century; (b) the victim was able to have the victim feel home; and (c) the victim was able to see that the victim was able to have her home home, “I am for the same year;” and (d) female customers were able to talk with the victim’s main store business by force during approximately one hour.

2. The Defendant, at around 23:30 on August 20, 2016, in the course of carrying out official duties, while the police patrol officer G, who was a police officer belonging to the police patrol station, dispatched to the scene after receiving a report by the Defendant 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, arrested the Defendant as a current criminal of interference with his/her duties and assault and escort him/her to the patrol team, he/she would show

On the other hand, while looking at the urine, G interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers in relation to the suppression of crime in case G's left face is taken into two states, which are kept by the lock without any reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, investigative reports and internal investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (such as the agreement with the victim of the obstruction of business, the reflection of the agreement with the victim of the obstruction of business, and the absence of any record of punishment for the same crime);

1. On August 20, 2016, the Defendant, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:30 on August 20, 2016, and the police officers dispatched after receiving a report of the instant case, arrive at the scene and listen to the circumstances of the instant case from the victim D.