Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant had a relation of interest from around 1998 to the end of 2016.
B. On March 17, 2009, the Defendant established C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) with the purpose of wholesale and retail business, distribution business, consultation, development, and supply of software as its objective business and assumed office as the representative director of the instant company.
C. Since the incorporation of the instant company, the Plaintiff is registered as an internal director on the corporate register until now, and the shareholding ratio of the Defendant, the Plaintiff, and the E (E) on the shareholder registry of the instant company is 45%, 40%, and 15%, respectively.
【In the absence of any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the parties’ assertion
A. From August 28, 2008 to December 23, 2016, the Plaintiff leased KRW 1,027,412,50 on several occasions to the Defendant. From October 9, 2008 to December 21, 2016, the Plaintiff received KRW 168,60,00 as principal repayment under the name of the Defendant, and KRW 147,853,851 as interest repayment, and KRW 316,453,851 as principal repayment under the order of the Defendant’s repayment, and KRW 310,605,463,851 as of June 8, 2017, the principal amount of KRW 812,605,463,468,617,208, which was paid by the Defendant to the Defendant as of June 28, 2017, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have paid the principal amount to the Defendant as of June 28, 2017.