logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2018.10.04 2018고단442
하천법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to occupy and use land in a river area shall obtain permission from the river management agency.

Nevertheless, on March 22, 2018, from around April 9, 2018 to around April 9, 2018, the Defendant occupied and used a river by installing a steel 74-dong with a steel girs or leasing it to a street store without obtaining the permission of a river management agency from the 5,000 square meters of the mar river located in Si-si, the river area.

Accordingly, the defendant occupied land within the river area without obtaining permission from the river management agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation - A written statement on a person in charge of accusation, a location map of illegal acts, a photograph of the current status of the establishment of C Nowonstore;

1. The accusation - The application of statutes governing the establishment of additional accusations, additional accusations, written statements, and content centers C in the River Act;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 5 of Article 95 of the River Act that selects a punishment, and Article 33 (1) 1 of the same Act (Selection of a punishment penalty);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is for the occupation and use of a crypum cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp m

Provided, That confession and reflect shall be made.

The evidence alone submitted that the defendant's act of occupation and use was committed in collusion with other employees.

It is insufficient to view it.

Even though it is repeated every year, the competent authorities do not seem to have neglected the occupancy and use of the defendant.

In addition, all the factors of sentencing as shown in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, health status, environment and family relationship, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment as shown in the order shall be determined.

arrow