A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around 13:00 on September 22, 2012, and the fact that the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the taxi operating fee, had by deceiving the victim C in spite of having no intent or ability to pay the taxi operating fee, and had the victim taken advantage of the victim’s personal taxi to the front side of the National Bank located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, the Defendant did not pay 28,00 won operating fee to the victim and did not pay 28,000 won to the victim.

2. Around 06:40 on September 23, 2012, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the taxi operation fee, by deceiving the victim E, as if the Defendant were to pay the taxi operation fee, and by inducing the victim E to take advantage of the Fjin-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, the Defendant moved to the front side of the No. 30,000 won in operation fee, and did not pay 30,000 won to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of E and written statements of C prepared;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The suspended sentence committed a crime under the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) which loses its validity during the suspended sentence (two years of suspended sentence for imprisonment for eight months). The criminal defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime committed at the time before and after the instant crime was committed (the criminal defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million on September 26, 2012 due to the crime of involuntary exploitation and assaulting an amount of KRW 500,000 on September 26, 2012 and KRW 80,000 on the day following the date on which he/she arrived at the inland Eup and KRW 50,000 on October 18, 2012).