The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years and six months of imprisonment.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment by the Incheon District Court for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence by the Gwangju Prison on May 26, 2015.

The defendant of "2015 Senior 4945" is a person subject to convening a social service personnel.

The Defendant did not respond to the convocation of a call-up notice in the name of the head of the regional military affairs office of Gwangju Nam-gu, Seoul on September 29, 2015, to the Social Welfare Department office of the Nam-gu, Seoul, the Military Manpower Administration on October 15, 2015, to the effect that “The Defendant called-up as the 31 association from November 14:00 on November 14, 2015,” which was received respectively from the office of social welfare services in the name of the head of the regional military affairs office of the regional military affairs administration of Gwangju-gu on September 29, 2015, and from the office of social welfare services in the Nam-gu, Gwangju District Military Manpower Administration on October 15

"2015 Highest 5168"

1. Fraud;

A. On June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (1) around June 23, 2015, on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle parked in the vicinity of the F building in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, “in-house loan business; and (2) repayment soon with loans obtained from mountain, scar, etc., will become final and conclusive.

The loan was made in a false manner to the effect that “the credit rating will be increased by making repayment within one month in a week with the loan granted in the name of thep,” and that “the change between the passbook and the check card to which the loan enters.”

However, the defendant did not engage in a loan business, and even if he was granted a loan in mountain and scar, he did not get credit rating until promptly repaid. The loan was thought to consume the loan due to entertainment expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he was given a loan in the name of the victim due to the lack of particular property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and received a new bank passbook (Account Number:G) and a physical card in the name of the victim from the victim, that is, the victim, and then, on the same day, have the victim borrow 3 million won in each of the child's child and the child's child's loan from the child's child's child and the child's child's child's child.