logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.08.30 2018고합138
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised in accordance with the evidence to the extent that it does not materially disadvantage the defendants' defense right.

Defendant

B was launched on June 13, 2018 as a preliminary candidate for F market G political party at the 7 simultaneous local elections conducted on June 13, 2018.

Defendant C is in charge of promoting H’s election campaign, and Defendant A is a dead village of H.

No one shall answer two or more telephone numbers by taking measures, such as call forwarding, etc. for the purpose of influencing the results of a public opinion poll on election, and answer questions or direct, induce or induce such answers twice or more by the same person.

Nevertheless, the Defendants knew that the competition in the party competition for the selection of candidates for G political party FF markets takes place by the method of citizen participation in the AR response method at the ratio of 50% of each right party member and right holder who is not a right member, and conspired with H’s election campaign head, the head of the FF situation office, in order to enhance the possibility of the H’s success by manipulating the rate of public opinion poll to be calculated at a higher level than the actual ones in the public opinion poll in a way of double response to the public opinion poll, after installing a large number of KT short-term excursion telephone stations, and making a new conversion to the mobile phone, and to affect the results of public opinion poll on the F market election.

Defendant

B) On February 22, 2018, the Defendant responded to the overlap of the short-term cable telephone call call call call call and the public opinion poll overlaped 15 short-term excursion telephone call call call called by Defendant C around J 3 and 4, to Defendant’s mobile phone (K) in the name of Defendant. On March 10, 2018, the Defendant respondeded to the overlap of 11 times with the content that Defendant C supported the preliminary candidate in the ARS public opinion poll (hereinafter “L public opinion”) holding the support for the preliminary candidate for F political party G in the F market of the LL Research Institute.

The defendant shall make a telephone call to M at a non-sworn place on February 2, 2018 for the installation of a short-term wire telephone and for soliciting duplicate answers to public opinion poll.

arrow