logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.12 2018고정601
청소년보호법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

However, the execution of the above fine for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell alcoholic beverages that are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

On February 13, 2018, at around 21:52, the Defendant sold 4,000 won per share of 44,000 won per share without verifying two identification cards from "D" located in Ansan-si, a member of the Defendant’s territory, and from "E (16:3)."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Crimes and Article 28 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Crimes.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. According to Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”), 70(1), and 69(2) of the Act on the Custody in the Nowon-gu Station (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant demanded identification cards to the juveniles on criminal facts, and the juveniles lost or did not possess identification cards, and presented identification cards taken on mobile phones that they did not lose or possess identification cards, and the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages after checking the face of his/her cell phone images and juveniles.

A police officer, upon receipt of a report, failed to verify that his/her photograph was not a photograph of a juvenile, solely based on the fact that he/she received an identification card taken from the juvenile, and that his/her fingerprints was not a photograph of the juvenile.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that the defendant has no criminal record in light of the circumstances of the above case and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record.

arrow