A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2014, the Defendant took a bath to “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Then, in order to restrain the Defendant from disturbing such a disturbance, the Defendant took once as head a police officer assigned to the police box, and obstructed legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and investigation of police officers, by walking the police officer two times along with his/her mouths.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Scope of recommendations: Imprisonment for not less than six months to not more than one year and four months;

(a) Type 1 of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (in the case of the obstruction of the performance of official duties/performance of official duties).

(b) No special person;

2. In light of the fact that the defendant in the decision of sentencing did assault a police officer in the course of performing official duties, the nature of the crime is not weak, but the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake late and reflects his mistake, and that the conditions of sentencing such as the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant are considered, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.