1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Nonparty D each share transfer registration is completed with respect to the area of 159.8 square meters in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant land”). The shares of the Plaintiff and the Defendant are 63.9/1598, and the shares of Nonparty D are 32/159.8.

B. The registration of transfer of shares in D and H are completed with respect to 96 square meters in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government GJ. The shares in D are 32/96, and H shares are 64/96.

C. Around 1988, the instant land and the instant G site were newly built a tobacco and sunlight and apap 2 colon (a total of 4 households, divided into 1,2 stories and b). The Plaintiff purchased shares in the instant land and No. 2 stories and completed the registration of ownership transfer by purchasing around 1989, and completed the registration of ownership transfer by purchasing shares in the instant land and No. 1 stories (b) around 2004, and the Defendant purchased shares in the instant land and completed the registration of ownership transfer at around that time.

(not a site registration is made in the building register).

The plaintiff, the defendant, D, and H are the owners of the above tenement house, and the J Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association established for the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project (hereinafter "the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association"), established for the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project by making the land size of 83,927.9 square meters as the project implementation district of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the project implementation district, has obtained approval of the management and disposal plan from the head of Gangnam-gu Office around 2008 and carried out the Housing Redevelopment and Development Project. Of the land of the above apartment house, part of the G land

E. The association of this case determined that the function of the building itself would be impossible due to the incorporation of a part of the above apartment house into the redevelopment project zone, and as part of the expanded compensation, the association of this case determined that the share of the above apartment house owned by it and the above G land incorporated into the above project zone after granting the membership permit to the owners of each of the above houses, including the plaintiff and the defendant.