Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

except that for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Frocland.

On July 24, 2015, around 06:00, the Defendant got to proceed at a speed of 60km from the side of the Banan Elementary School to the side of the Banyang Elementary School, the two-lanes of the Banyang Elementary School.

Since there is a signal signal, there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by safely operating a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the right side of the victim B (the 58-year-old taxi) who went to the right side of the Defendant’s running in contravention of the yellow signal, thereby going to the right side of the Defendant’s driving, due to the negligence by entering the intersection as it is, and going to the right side, and by going to the right side of the Defendant’s driving in contravention of the yellow light signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained an injury to the victim B, such as a ductal of the left-hand body body flag, which requires treatment for about 6 weeks, and suffered injury to the victim H (age 46) who was accompanied by the said victim’s taxi flag for about 12 weeks in need of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in driving a G rocketing taxi.

The defendant continued the road above the temporary border as stated in paragraph (1) at approximately 30 km each hour according to one-lane between the two-lanes of the side of the side of the side of the side of the river elementary school and the side of the side of the side.

Since there is a signal signal, there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by safely operating a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent.