Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 2018, the Defendant: (a) installed locking devices at the entrance doors of the council of lessees’ representatives in a management dong managed by the victim D, the head of the management office, for the purpose of occupying and using the council of lessees’ representatives, which is a common facility for residents, in a rental housing management unit C apartment complex located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) and (c) did not entrust the key to the management office, thereby impairing the utility of the entrance.

2. The Defendant interfered with business by force, such as prohibiting the victim and lessee from entering the council of lessees’ representatives, which is a public facility, by failing to install lock devices at the entrance of the council of lessees’ representatives within the management Dong managed by the head of management office D and leaving keys to the management office, and obstructing the management of the council of lessees’ representatives’ representatives by force.

Summary of Evidence

Part of Defendant’s Court Statements

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. A complaint;

1. Photographs of a locking room of the council of lessees' representatives;

1. Answer to inquiries related to the management rules on rental housing, minutes of the election commission, the results of meetings of the election commission, and management affairs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Submission of additional data by a complainant);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant is entitled to legally use the arguments after obtaining permission from the former managing office for the use of the conference room.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1)