logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.10.28 2016고단1539
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 26, 2016, around 19:45, the Defendant destroyed the destruction of property by gathering one of the unexplosion of the market value on the table table at the market price on the table table, on the ground that the victim, who was a big part of the victim C, within the private teaching institute for the entrance of the victim C’s operation in Daegu-gun-gun (Seoul-gun), did not enter the home-based funeral hall.

2. The Defendant was at the time, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and the police box of the achieved Police Station that was called out after receiving a report of 112 while avoiding disturbance as above, saying that the circumstances leading up to the police box of the achieved Police Station, which led the Defendant to restrain the Defendant and questioning the circumstances, “whether the police will interfere with the public power of the Defendant,” the Defendant carried the chest of the above E once by hand, and put the drinking on the right side side of the above E once to the face of the said E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties related to the handling of 112 reporting duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of field photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It shall be sentenced to a fine identical to the order in consideration of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the primary offender, the circumstances leading to the crime, the degree, age, and reflects on the abuse, etc.

arrow