1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,922,80,000 and the Plaintiff’s 12% per annum from February 7, 2010 to September 4, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s status as the parties is an asset-backed specialized company established under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act on December 16, 2009 by investing in the Korea Asset Management Corporation, a limited liability company, a Pakistan partnership, etc. (hereinafter “frequency”) and takes over the loans held by financial institutions, security rights, such as mortgage, and other rights accompanied or incidental to them, from financial institutions. Such rights, etc. are issued as securitization bonds and asset-backed investment certificates by using them as securitized assets and issuing them with securitization bonds and asset-backed investment certificates with the profits of managing, operating, and disposing of them, and repaying the principal and interest of the asset-backed bonds.

The defendant is a bank authorized by the Banking Act that is dealing with loan business pursuant to the Banking Act.

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

1) The Plaintiff Company was unable to have an employee under the Asset-Backed Securitization Act, and only non-standing officers exist, and the actual business was performed by the Korea Asset Management Corporation, the major shareholders of the Plaintiff Company, and the Korea Asset Management Corporation and the Pakistan. The Korea Asset Management Corporation and the Pakistan (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

A) On October 15, 2009, prior to the incorporation of the Plaintiff Company, the Defendant and Samil Accounting Corporation (hereinafter “Korea”) are part of the public-private partnership JV program at the Defendant’s office as part of the public-private partnership JV program.

(2) A security right, such as a security right, a security right, and any other rights incidental thereto (hereinafter referred to as “instant securitization assets”) against 24 borrowers, including any other loans, guaranteed claims, and mortgages secured therefor.

2) At the time of the first Kick Off meeting to discuss the transfer schedule, acquisition type, and conditions of issuance of senior bonds and middle-class bonds (Evidence (Evidence (Evidence (2)). 2) In order to take charge of the inspection and valuation of the securitization assets of this case, the third-party accounting corporation participated in the above meeting to take charge of the inspection and valuation of the securitization assets of this case. The plaintiff is the plaintiff.