1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The network D and E had eight South Koreas, including F, Plaintiff B, G, Defendant, Plaintiff A, H, I, and J, as their children.

(b) Details of the change of ownership of two real estate owned by E are as follows:

On May 19, 2006, the owner of the transfer of ownership (E) on June 13, 2006, who was not the reason for registration (title) and on June 13, 2006: L on June 13, 2006, the provisional registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership (Defendant) on June 13, 2006, cancellation of April 29, 2010, which was prohibited on April 29, 2010, without the consent of the said Corporation under the Korea Housing Finance Corporation Act, on July 8, 2016, the transfer of ownership (Defendant) on July 8, 2016 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) On July 22, 1992, July 22, 1992, the provisional registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership (Defendant) on November 20, 1969 on the date of registration (title D), the purpose of the registration (titled cause for registration) and the transfer of ownership (E) on March 19, 202 on March 18, 2002 on the donation of March 24, 2002 on May 24, 2006, the sale of ownership (Uk SPPPP Co., Ltd.) No. 1 of the former M on May 24, 2005 (hereinafter “the instant house”) during Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (Uk Sker 2, 2005 on November 18, 2005).

C. After the death of the network D, E died on April 17, 2016, and children, including the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, inherited each of the network E’s property 1/8 shares.

(hereinafter “E”). 【E” (Reasons for Recognition ] without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The plaintiffs asserted as the cause of the claim in this case. ① The apartment of this case bequeathed by the defendant belongs to the property that forms the basis of calculating the legal reserve of inheritance. The defendant sold to 250,000,000 won. ② After the ancestor disposed of the housing of this case, the defendant donated KRW 1,00,000 out of the disposal price to the defendant. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant donated the housing of this case to the defendant, and that the amount of KRW 21,875,000 (1,000,000,000) was infringed upon each legal reserve of inheritance x 1/8,000 x 1/2 [2].

B. Legal reserve of the apartment of this case