logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.24 2013고단1047
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:00 on August 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with the cacker’s cacker’s cacker’s cacker, which is a dangerous object from chemical cacker, on the ground that the victim D (n, 30 years of age) marks the cacker’s cacker’s cacker; (b) caused the victim to go over the ground level; and (c) caused the victim to go beyond the cacker’s cacker’s cacker for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of statement D in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written diagnosis on D;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to medical records of a victim);

1. 사진, 사건 관련 녹화영상 (위 각 증거에 의하면, 피해자가 피고인이 운전하는 포크레인 앞에서 피고인을 촬영하자 피고인은 피해자에게 욕설을 하면서 갑자기 포크레인의 버킷을 피해자의 머리 위로 들어 올려 찍어 내릴 듯이 위협하였고 이에 피해자가 놀라 바닥에 넘어지면서 엉덩방아를 찧은 사실이 인정되는데, 위 사실에 의하면, 당시 피고인에게 미필적으로나마 피해자에 대한 상해의 고의가 있었다고 봄이 타당하다) 법령의 적용

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on Criminal Offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1248, Apr. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Do129, Apr. 2, 201

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

arrow