A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 22, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A contract deposit is insufficient to sell land” by phoneing the victim C at an infinite place. If the Defendant lent KRW 15 million to the victim, he/she is the D representative director and is the government-funded public officials of the Newanan-gun, who will immediately repay the construction cost at the time of the discharge.”

In fact, the Defendant did not have any payment for the construction work from the Newan Military, and there was no intention or ability to pay the payment even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 15 million won as the borrowed money from the victim to the Defendant’s Suhyup account on the same day.

2. On July 16, 2010, the Defendant called the victim C by phoneing the victim C at an unsound place, and falsely stated that “The construction cost was not paid from the ASEAN-gun. need to pay money, such as labor cost and material cost. At the time when the construction cost was paid, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million, along with the borrowed money at the time when the payment was paid.”

In fact, the Defendant did not have any payment for the construction work from the Newan Military, and there was no intention or ability to pay the payment even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 5 million won from the victim to the Defendant’s horizontal account on the same day as the Defendant borrowed money and acquired it by deceit.

3. On July 26, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, “The construction cost was not paid in the Aaran-gun, Haak-gun, a material cost, etc., in the vicinity of the 202 underground parking lot, Supo-si, Supo-si, Supo-si, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The construction cost was not paid; (b) labor cost or material cost was required; (c) the construction cost was paid with the borrowed money at once, and KRW 2 million was lent.”

In fact, the defendant did not receive the construction cost from the new military, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim.