A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On February 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and three months of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement, etc. by the Seoul Southern District Court, and on September 28, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court completed the enforcement of the sentence.

[2] On November 2015, around November 2015, the Defendant, at the “D cafeteria” of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, can be seen as making a lot of profits if the Defendant purchases and sells the Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot in a large amount of money to the victim E.

The loan of 20 million won for the purchase cost of the Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju High District. On the other hand, the principal amount of 20 million won after one month shall be paid in addition to the profit of 20 million won in the following month.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant only had a vague expectation of the Dottt-St-St-Stt-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-St-S

On November 13, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was delivered KRW 20 million to the H bank account (number I) in the name of G on November 13, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the prosecution of some part of the defendant (including the E statement);

1. Information and transaction details on account founders in the G name;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as the results of search by prisoners, copies of written judgments, and criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The Defendant who was sentenced to an aggravated repeated crime under Article 35 of the Criminal Act is not likely to have committed another repeated crime during the period of a repeated crime after the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, and it is difficult to expect it easily in the future without restoring damage.