logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.02.16 2016고단1616
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 5, 2016, at around 22:40, the Defendant, as C’s substitute driver, tried to go beyond other articles despite having been assigned by the proxy driver call center, who was waiting to contact the substitute driver of the driver call center on the vehicle and was waiting to contact with the driver of the same company, on the road in front of Dong-si, Dong-si, Dong-si, Dong-si. However, the Defendant attempted to go beyond other articles despite waiting to go through the substitute driver’s license while the Defendant was waiting to contact the substitute driver at the driver call center.

”라고 간섭을 하였다는 이유로 화가 나, 조수석에서 내려 뒷좌석의 문을 연 후 피해자에게 “ 씨 발 새끼야 ”라고 욕설을 하며 손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 당기고, 주먹으로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 수회 때렸으며 발로 피해자의 옆구리 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim in the first cage of the victim, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A medical certificate, medical confirmation, F medical records, or first-aid service activity record with F, part of the police's statement records against G, or the police's statement records against G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (for details of a written diagnosis of a victim);

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the reason for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor is not good, and the injury therefrom is not considerable, and the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for eight months on November 20, 2015, by obstructing the performance of official duties in the Changwon District Court’s branch branch, and thus obstructing the performance of official duties. On November 28, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on November 28, 2015, and was not agreed with the victim during the suspended sentence period. The victim wanting to punish the Defendant with severe punishment, and the victim was recognized as a substitute for the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and environment.

arrow