logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.08.23 2018고정1128
주택법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No housing constructed and supplied by a project undertaker or the status of being selected as an occupant of housing, which is subject to the upper limit of sale price, and the status of being selected as an occupant of such housing shall resell the housing or status or arrange for resale thereof before a period prescribed by Presidential Decree elapses from the date the first contract for housing supply is concluded.

The Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment building, which is a house subject to the application of the apartment sale price, was publicly announced on January 15, 2015, and the receipt of special supply and the publication of the prize on January 20, 2015, receipt of the general supply order on January 21, 2015, receipt of the order of priority supply 1 and 2, receipt of the general supply order on January 22, 2015, receipt of the general supply order on January 22, 2015, announcement and allocation of general winners and the number of houses on January 28, 2015, the apartment supply contract was concluded from February 2, 2015 to February 4, 2015, so it shall not be allowed to resell or mediate the right of resale for sale for one year from February 22, 2015, which is the date when the first apartment supply contract can be concluded.

1. Defendant A, at around February 4, 2015, reselled the status of being selected as an occupant before a given period expires by receiving and selling the so-called “right to sell the above C Apartment 122 Dong 1106, which was won in the name of the Defendant, to D, the right to sell the above C Apartment 122 Dong 1106, which was won in the name of the Defendant.

2. Defendant B, at around February 2, 2015, sold the above C apartment unit 105 Dong 1202, which was won in the name of the Defendant, to E, and sold it to E, prior to the lapse of a given period, the status of being selected as an occupant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on internal investigation (attached to CDs, such as the departments of the F place of business, certificates of process, and materials on financial settlement reply), and a report on internal investigation (specific households for illegally resale of the C apartment sales right);

1. A copy of a report (attached to the certificate of business of promissory notes with 28 households on illegal resale), a copy of the certificate of business of promissory notes related to A, and a copy of the certificate;

1.Report on internal investigation (verification of the C Public Notice and Confirmation of the Period of Restriction on Resale) and C Apartment.

arrow