logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고정1372
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and C, and the victim D(46 tax) were investigated by around 3:20 p.m. on January 13, 2015 by the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station and the E team into fraud, and the victim was investigated by the Defendant and C and the victim D (46 tax) on the job in which C and police officers F are located. The victim “Irre fe such as the future fe would have known of the human waste?”

Man Man Man Habk

The victims were openly insulting, such as the term “I am, I am, I am,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The part of the witness F’s statement made by the Defendant during the witness D and F’s respective legal statements, and the part of the witness D’s statement that at least 2-3 persons, other than the Defendant C and the victim, were under the further examination in the office where the Defendant was able to have her desire to examine the victim;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the defendant or C;

1. The F Statement [F] was prepared by investigative agencies and in this Court, there was no other civilians except the Defendant, C, and the Victim in the office at the time.

Although the Defendant stated to the effect that he was “,” the Defendant was a witness in an investigative agency on the other hand.

The question “I, at the time, memory that other investigators were seated in the place of the investigation.”

In light of the fact that “A” refers to the fact that (23 pages of the investigation record) is recognized, it is difficult for other investigators in the investigation and office at the time to exclude the probability that the investigation was being conducted against civilians, and (2) D specifically states the appearance, appearance, appearance, appearance, etc. of other civilians in this court, the legal statement of D should be deemed to have experienced or observed at the time.

Therefore, credibility can be given to the statement.

We do not accept the defendant's appeal that does not wish the victim to do so or that the defendant's appeal disputing performance is dismissed.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow