1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 11,639,352 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 5,191,512 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from December 8, 2015 to May 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is engaged in the sale of sound vibration sports equipment and the solicitation business of chain stores. On September 24, 2015, E and F et al., the actual operator of E and F et al., were convicted of violating the Door-to-Door Sales, etc. Act, violating the Act on the Regulation on Door-to-Door Sales, etc. under the Door-Door Sales, etc. Act, violating the Act on the Regulation of Unauthorized-to-Door Sales, etc., and having been convicted of fraud. The judgment became final and conclusive, as it is, and the summary of the crime of

No one shall engage in any fund-raising business without obtaining authorization or permission under any Act or subordinate statute for the payment of the total amount of investments or any amount in excess thereof to an unspecified number of people without obtaining such authorization or permission.

Nevertheless, at around July 12, 2013, the Defendants conspired to obtain authorization or permission under the relevant laws and regulations, and again entrusted G with the company with the purchase of a means of expression of expression equivalent to KRW 7 million, by means of the same method from June 3, 2013 to June 2, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 8,1922,285,000 in total from 68,688 to 8,192,288, as the purchase price of the means of purchase of the apparatus, and received KRW 50,000 in a monthly amount of KRW 50,000 from 12 months to 50% after maturity to purchase the apparatus, and received it as the purchase price of the apparatus.

2) As described in the foregoing paragraph 1, the Defendants received KRW 7 million from the victim G as the purchase price for the apparatus from June 3, 2013 to June 2, 2015, and acquired KRW 8,1922,285,000 through the same method as the purchase price for the apparatus through the same method, including obtaining KRW 68,688 from the victim as the purchase price for the apparatus.

A person shall be appointed.

B. On June 7, 2017, the Defendant operated D’s HK, and the Daegu District Court 2016 High Court Decision 2169 decided Jun. 7, 2017.