The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is not a person handling narcotics.

On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant received approximately 0.05 g of the 4th floor of “D” located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, from E, the Mepter (hereinafter “ponopon”).

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the place of the foregoing paragraph (a), inserted approximately 0.05g of phiphonephones received from E into a single-use injection machine, dilutioned with bio-phones, and administered phiphones by means of injection to his arms and blood cells.

2. In light of the fact that the appraisal result on the Defendant’s urine (a approximately 30ml) and hair (a approximately 100ml) which can prove the administration of the instant phiphones has not been submitted as evidence (the witness E made a statement at an investigative agency to the effect that the Defendant administered phiphones with F, and as a result of appraisal, the Defendant’s phiphones were detected with F’s phiphones), the witness E, and F’s statements are inconsistent with each other, and even they are not consistent with each other’s investigative agency and court statements, the fact that the Defendant received and administered phiphones alone cannot be deemed to have been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt about the fact that the Defendant received and administered phiphones, and the remainder of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be recognized.

Thus, since each of the above facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, it is not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant under Article 58 (2) of the Criminal