logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.11 2012고단6020
약사법위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

Among the facts charged in the instant case, the supply of food materials is related to the price of goods.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, as a doctor, is the actual operator of the “N” member located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City M, and Defendant B, as the above administrative director, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Incheon District Court on October 21, 2010 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Incheon District Court on June 30, 201.

1. Any pharmacy founder, pharmacy employee, or pharmacy founder, medical institution founder, or person working for a medical institution shall be prohibited from engaging in the act of collusion, such as offering money, goods, benefits, labor, entertainment and other economic benefits, in return for the arrangement at the bar of the wife;

A. Defendant A, B, and D’s co-offenders: (a) leased the name of the doctor’sO; (b) first established a medical institution; and (c) received money and valuables from pharmacists who want to establish a pharmacy located in the building in which the said medical institution moved.

Defendant

A and B conspired on December 28, 2010, in the office of sale of " Q" in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City P, a basic explanatory note was drawn up to the effect that "D promises to put 200 cases of average prescription per day within six months after opening the hospital and pays KRW 100 million in return for this promise."

Defendant

D transferred KRW 30 million to a new bank account in the name of R (Account Number: S) in return for arranging such prescriptions on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants committed a collaborative act of accepting money in return for soliciting prescriptions.

B. Defendant A, B, and C’s co-principal offenders A and B are as follows.

A. Before June 4, 201, in collusion with the entry in the subsection, the foregoing paragraph shall apply.

At the office mentioned in paragraph (1), Defendant C, a pharmacist, demanded that KRW 150,000,000 be paid in return for arranging the prescription of the above NNE under the name of “Premium premium,” and Defendant C accepted it.

After that, Defendant C, in return for prescription intermediation, shall pay KRW 80 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number U) in the name of Defendant B, the wife of Defendant B on the same day, KRW 50 million in the same month, and KRW 17,000 in the same month.

arrow