The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) phoneed to D, the Defendant, who was aware of the victim C, a workplace partner, at the insular district of Daejeon Metropolitan City (Seoul Metropolitan City) around December 31, 2014, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts to the effect that “C and the point of occupation in a restaurant are sexual intercourse.”

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

B. On June 16, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, the injured party submitted a written agreement and a written application for non-guilty punishment that the injured party does not want to be punished against the defendant.

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act